Fr. Pavone criticizes study

This forum is a place to discuss issues regarding NFP (Natural Family Planning) and related subjects. It is a place not only to talk about the mechanics of NFP, but also about the moral and physical dangers of contraception as well as the joys and blessings of children and families. As in the other forums, the teachings of the Catholic Church are to be respected. Keep conversation adult and polite.

Moderators: johnmc, Johnna, MarieT

Post Reply
User avatar
Denise
Site Admin
Posts: 26983
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Fr. Pavone criticizes study

Post by Denise » Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:11 pm

Fr. Pavone criticizes study suggesting that 6-month olds in the womb cannot feel pain

WASHINGTON DC, USA, August 24 (CNA) - Fr. Frank Pavone, head of the group Priests for Life has criticized a study, being published today in The Journal of the American Medical Association, which concludes that fetuses, 29 weeks-old and younger probably cannot feel pain and therefore, do not require anesthetic during abortions.

A report in today’s New York Times suggested that, “The finding poses a direct challenge to proposed federal and state laws that would compel doctors to tell women having abortions at 20 weeks or later that their fetuses can feel pain and to offer them anesthesia specifically for the fetus.”

Fr. Pavone pointed out however that, "The disputed report coming out of the University of California, indicating that pain may not be felt by unborn children during abortions in early pregnancy, hardly settles the matter scientifically."

"Other studies”, he said, “over the last 15 years around the world show evidence of earlier fetal pain. Research has to continue. Meanwhile, it makes sense to err on the side of caution."

He also pointed out that the mere possibility of pain should give pause to supporters and those performing abortions.

Even if the dubious study is correct, Fr. Pavone pointed out, it would still not justify abortions.

"There are many painless ways to kill both born and unborn,” he said. “That doesn't make it right."

back to top I comment this article

Post Reply